Both of us build a content operation around a founder rather than selling loose edits. The differences are in what gets published, what it costs, and who is actually in the building doing the work.
Everything below about Metro Media House comes from their own public pages, read on 24 September 2026. Check it yourself
Metro Media House are in the same fight we are, which is worth saying plainly, because they are not a per-video editing shop, they describe a content operation with strategy, scripting, creative direction, editing and distribution in it, and that is close enough to what we do that a founder could reasonably be choosing between us.
I read their public pages on 24 September 2026 and what they publish is a tiering, so Core starts at 20 short-form videos a month with editing, thumbnails, captions, design assets and platform formatting, the Operating System tier covers the full content operation, and Enterprise is described as upwards of 100 curated videos a month with dedicated clipping teams. They also state a 3-month commitment with no trial periods, and they point at 1B+ views generated, 8,000+ videos created and 4 years of brand building.
What they do not publish anywhere I could find is price, or where their team sits, and that is not a criticism, plenty of good agencies hold pricing back for the call, it just means a comparison page has to say so rather than invent a number, right, so let me compare what is actually on the table.
Their column is what Metro Media House publishes, ours is what we publish. Where they do not state something, the row says so instead of guessing.
| Pixel Samy Studio | Metro Media House | |
|---|---|---|
| Published starting price | $2,000 a month | Not published on their site |
| Entry volume | Up to 200 short-form videos and 30 long-form videos a month | Core starts at 20 short-form videos a month |
| Top tier described | Strategy-led engagements above the $2,000 entry point | Enterprise, upwards of 100 curated videos a month with dedicated clipping teams |
| Thumbnails | Included, packaged with titles by our sister studio ClickTheory | Included in the Core tier alongside captions and design assets |
| Commitment | Monthly engagement | 3-month commitment, with no trial periods |
| Where the team sits | Close to 50 in-house editors in Dubai | Not stated on their site |
| Stated track record | Seven owned YouTube channels past 100,000 subscribers, 400+ podcast episodes a month | 1B+ views generated, 8,000+ videos created, 4 years of brand building |
The interesting thing about comparing us with Metro Media House is that we are both selling volume, so the question is not whether volume is the right idea, it is what the number means once you are inside it.
Their Core tier starts at 20 short-form videos a month and their Enterprise tier is described as upwards of 100 curated videos a month with dedicated clipping teams. Our entry point is a ceiling of up to 200 short-form videos and 30 long-form videos for $2,000, and I want to be careful here, because a ceiling is not a promise that you will publish 230 pieces every month, it is the room you have got.
The practical version of this is that the number only means something if your raw material supports it. If you give us one forty minute recording a month, nobody should be cutting two hundred pieces out of it, and I will say that on the call rather than after you sign, because thin clips repeated across four platforms is how a feed stops working.
So the honest comparison is not 200 against 100, it is what each studio needs from you to hit its number, and how the plan gets built so that one focused shoot day carries a month of publishing, which is the part that actually decides whether volume helps or hurts, right.
We publish our entry price and they do not, and I want to be fair about what that does and does not tell you.
Hiding price is not a red flag on its own. When an engagement genuinely varies with scope, a published number can mislead more than it helps, and plenty of very good agencies take that view deliberately, so the absence of a number on their site is a choice rather than a problem.
What it does mean practically is that you cannot compare the two of us on your own time. You can take our $2,000 and your own publishing plan and work out your cost per asset in about ninety seconds, and to do the same with them you have to book a call and sit through a proposal, and for a founder who is quietly evaluating four agencies in the background that friction is real.
The catch here is on our side too, because publishing a number means people compare us on it without the context, so let me add the context. The $2,000 is the entry point, the strategy-led engagements cost more than that, and if somebody tells you a full content department with strategy and distribution costs the same as a per-video editing service, they are selling you something.
Metro Media House do not state where their team is based, which is common, and most agency sites in this category are equally quiet about it.
We say it on every page. Close to fifty editors in-house in Dubai, on our own payroll, which is a deliberate structure rather than a geography flex, because the alternative that is normal in this industry is a small core team plus a bench of freelancers who are also working for three other agencies, and that bench is where turnaround promises quietly go to die.
There is a second reason it matters for founder content specifically. Your voice is the product. An editor who has cut forty of your videos knows which pauses to keep, which tangent is you thinking rather than you rambling, and what you would never say, and that knowledge only compounds if the same people stay on the account, which is much easier to guarantee when they sit in your building rather than in a talent pool.
And for timezones, Dubai lands in the middle of the working day for Europe, India and the Gulf and still overlaps a US morning, so notes sent at nine in the evening in London are usually answered before breakfast.
They ask for a three month commitment with no trial period, and honestly, I understand it completely.
Month one of any content engagement is mostly setup, working out the positioning, the pillars, the formats, the shoot pattern, the look of the captions and the thumbnails, and the first batch always takes longer than it will ever take again. Month two is where the machine starts running. Month three is the first month where the output looks like what you are actually buying, and judging any of this on month one is like judging a gym membership on the first workout.
We run monthly, and I would rather earn the next month than lock it, but I will tell any founder the same thing on the first call, that if you are planning to judge this in thirty days you should not start, because you will cancel right before the part where it works.
So the difference here is contractual rather than philosophical. We agree on the timeline it takes, we just handle the paperwork differently, and if a three month commitment is a dealbreaker for you then that is a genuine reason to pick us, and if it is not, it should not be the thing that decides it.
If I were choosing between two studios that both promise a content operation, I would ignore the decks and ask four questions.
Who, specifically, will be editing my videos in month six, and are they employed by you. Ask it exactly like that, because the answer separates a studio with a team from a studio with a network, and neither is wrong but you should know which you are buying.
What do you need from me every month to hit the volume you are quoting, because if the answer is vague then the number on the page is decoration. Ours is a planned shoot day plus a review loop, and if you cannot give that, the ceiling is theoretical.
Who writes the titles and the thumbnails, and what are they basing it on. We base it on seven of our own channels past a hundred thousand subscribers, which is the only reason I would trust anybody's opinion on packaging, including mine.
And finally, what happens in month two when something is not working. The answer you want is a specific change to the plan rather than more volume, because doing more of a thing that is not landing is the most expensive mistake in this whole category.
The useful version of this page, because a comparison where the other studio never wins is a comparison nobody believes.
Go with Metro Media House if their portfolio is full of founders who look like you and sound like you, because at this level of service that is a more useful signal than any feature list, and they have clearly done a lot of volume for people in media, tech, SaaS and D2C.
The 3-month commitment is also a genuine positive if you know your own pattern, because building a content system does take that long before it tells you anything, and an agency that says so up front is being straight with you rather than selling a thirty day miracle.
Come to us when you want the numbers before the call, because our entry point is $2,000 a month for up to 200 short-form videos and 30 long-form videos with thumbnails included, and you can do that arithmetic against your own publishing plan tonight rather than waiting for a proposal.
It also matters if you care where the work happens. Ours is close to 50 people in-house in Dubai, which means the same team learns your voice and stays on it, and if you are in Europe, India or the Gulf you get same-day back and forth rather than a twelve hour lag on every note, and you can read how that engine works on our content flywheel page.
Vidpros sells you a dedicated editor's hours every workday. We sell a finished content operation with a volume ceiling on top. Here is the honest split, with both sets of published numbers.
Tasty Edits publish a clear price for every single video. We publish a monthly ceiling. The maths flips somewhere around fifteen pieces a month, and here is exactly where.
Kurogo build a founder's whole public profile including PR, ghostwriting and podcast bookings. We build and run the video engine underneath a founder brand. Most people need one of these far more than the other.
Ohh My Brand publish a full personal branding menu, from a $900 complete journey to $1,900 a month for PR. We publish $2,000 a month for 200 short-form and 30 long-form videos. Most founders eventually need both halves.
If you are comparing two studios who both promise the whole operation, bring me their proposal and your publishing plan, and I will tell you honestly where we are the better fit and where we are not. So yeah. That's my way of saying it.