Tasty Edits publish a clear price for every single video. We publish a monthly ceiling. The maths flips somewhere around fifteen pieces a month, and here is exactly where.
Everything below about Tasty Edits comes from their own public pages, read on 24 September 2026. Check it yourself
Tasty Edits are one of the few studios in this space who put real prices on the page, and I want to say that up front, because most agencies in our category hide behind a book-a-call button and it makes honest comparison almost impossible, so credit where it is due.
What they sell is per-video editing, and I read the numbers off their own pricing page on 24 September 2026, so a horizontal video runs from $327 down to $278 each depending on how many you buy, a vertical video runs from $94 down to $80 each, thumbnails are a $43 add-on, and the turnaround they publish is 48 hours on horizontal and 24 hours on vertical with unlimited revisions.
What we sell is a monthly ceiling, $2,000 for up to 200 short-form videos and 30 long-form videos with thumbnails included, produced by our in-house team in Dubai, and the reason these two models feel so different in practice is that one of them charges you more every time you decide to publish more, and the other one gets cheaper per piece the more you use it, right, which is the whole conversation on this page.
Their column is what Tasty Edits publishes, ours is what we publish. Where they do not state something, the row says so instead of guessing.
| Pixel Samy Studio | Tasty Edits | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Monthly, $2,000 for a published ceiling of finished assets | Per video, with volume discounts at 4, 8, 15 and 30 videos |
| Short-form video price | Included in the $2,000, up to 200 a month | $94 for one, $88 each at 15 videos, $80 each at 30 videos |
| Long-form video price | Included in the $2,000, up to 30 a month | $327 for one, $305 each at 4 videos, $278 each at 8 videos |
| Thumbnails | Included, packaged with the title by our sister studio ClickTheory | $43 add-on per video |
| Turnaround | Built around your publishing calendar, with a 24 hour turnaround on our podcast line | 24 hours on vertical video, 48 hours on horizontal video |
| Revisions | Agreed per engagement | Unlimited revisions, stated on the pricing page |
| Channel management | Strategy and distribution sit inside the engagement | Separate plans at $1,490 and $2,370 a month billed quarterly |
Let me do this properly with their published numbers rather than hand waving, because this is the one section that decides it for most people.
At their volume rate, thirty vertical videos cost $80 each, so $2,400. Eight horizontal videos cost $278 each, so $2,224. Thumbnails are $43 on top of each video if you want them, and most people do, which is another $1,290 on thirty videos. So a founder publishing thirty shorts and eight long-form videos a month with thumbnails is looking at roughly $5,900 with a per-video model.
Our entry point is $2,000 a month and the ceiling on it is 200 short-form videos and 30 long-form videos with thumbnails included, so the same output sits inside the entry plan with a lot of room left over.
Now flip it the other way, because that is the honest half. A founder publishing five shorts and one long-form video a month pays about $800 with them and $2,000 with us, and at that volume they are simply the cheaper answer and I would tell you so on a call.
The crossover sits somewhere around fifteen to twenty pieces a month depending on your mix, and the catch here is that most founders underestimate where they will be in six months, so it is worth doing the sum for the volume you are trying to reach rather than the volume you are stuck at today.
There is a behavioural thing that happens with per-video pricing that nobody really talks about, and I have watched it happen with founders more than once.
When every extra video has a price tag attached to it, you start editing your own ambition. You skip the clip that was probably good but not certainly good, you do not test the second hook, you do not cut the same interview three different ways to see which framing lands, because each of those experiments costs another eighty or three hundred dollars, and so you quietly become more conservative exactly where you should be experimenting.
With a ceiling, the incentive flips. Cutting the same long-form piece four different ways costs you nothing extra, so you do it, and then you find out which version actually performs, which is the only way anybody learns what their audience responds to.
I am not claiming this makes us better, to be very honest it makes us better for a specific kind of operator, the one who wants to be publishing constantly and learning from volume. If your content plan is six carefully considered videos a quarter, the ceiling is wasted on you and the per-video model will suit you far better, and that is a perfectly sensible way to run a brand.
Tasty Edits price thumbnails at $43 as an add-on, which is a completely normal way to do it in this industry, and I understand why, because a good thumbnail is a real piece of design work and it takes a designer time.
The reason we fold it in is different. We run seven YouTube channels of our own, every one of them past a hundred thousand subscribers, and the single most reliable lesson from those channels is that the thumbnail and the title are not decoration on top of the video, they are the thing that decides whether the video gets watched at all, right, so treating them as an optional extra always felt backwards to us.
So on our side the packaging comes as part of the work, and it is handled by our sister studio ClickTheory, which does nothing but thumbnails and titles all day for other people's channels too.
The practical difference shows up at volume. On thirty videos a month, a $43 add-on is $1,290, which is most of another retainer, and the temptation is to skip it on the videos you are less sure about, which are usually the ones that needed the help most.
Tasty Edits say you work with a personal video editor and a video manager on every order, which is a good structure, and having a named manager between you and the edit is genuinely useful when you are sending a lot of notes.
On our side the whole team sits in-house in Dubai, close to fifty people, on our payroll, in one building with the producers. That matters most on the weeks that go wrong, right, when a launch moves forward by four days or a guest recording lands late on a Thursday and everything needs recutting for Monday, because at that point the question is whether somebody can walk over and move the queue, or whether your job is sitting in a contractor's inbox behind somebody else's job.
There is a fair counterpoint, and I will make it for them. A distributed model with per-video pricing means you are never paying for idle capacity, and if your needs are unpredictable that flexibility is worth real money.
At the end of the day the honest framing is that we are carrying a fixed team so that volume and turnaround stay predictable, and you are paying for that predictability, which is only worth it if you actually need it.
Take last month, count what you actually published, and split it into short-form and long-form. Price that basket with their published rates, add $43 per thumbnail, and put it next to our $2,000. Whichever number is smaller is your answer for today.
Then do it again for the volume you want to be at in six months, because the whole point of hiring anybody is to get to that number, and a model that punishes you for publishing more is a strange thing to sign up for if growth is the plan.
After that there are three questions worth asking both of us. Who decides what gets made next, because if the answer is you then you are buying editing rather than content. Who writes the thumbnail and the title, because that is where most of the performance comes from. And what happens on a week when everything moves, because that is when you find out what you actually bought.
If you want, send me what you published last month and I will do the arithmetic honestly, including the version where they come out cheaper, since a client who signs up for the wrong model leaves in four months anyway and nobody wins there.
The useful version of this page, because a comparison where the other studio never wins is a comparison nobody believes.
Go with Tasty Edits when your volume is low or spiky and you want to pay only for what you actually publish, because if you put out six shorts and one long-form video in a month, you will spend somewhere around six hundred dollars with them and roughly two thousand with us, and I am not going to pretend that is a close call.
They are also the better answer when you want to test an editing partner with a single video before committing to anything, or when unlimited revisions matter to you more than volume, for instance if you are making a small number of high-stakes brand videos where the tenth pass is the one that matters.
Come to us when the volume is the point. Thirty vertical videos at their best rate is $2,400, and thirty short-form videos is a light month for the kind of founder we work with, so once you are publishing daily the per-video model starts charging you for exactly the thing you are trying to do more of.
It also makes sense when you want the thinking included rather than just the cutting, because somebody still has to decide what gets filmed, what each clip is for, which platform it belongs on, and what the thumbnail and the title should say, and with per-video pricing that job stays with you, whereas with us it is the content flywheel we are running on your behalf.
Vidpros sells you a dedicated editor's hours every workday. We sell a finished content operation with a volume ceiling on top. Here is the honest split, with both sets of published numbers.
KIMP sell unlimited video requests with two active at a time. We sell a published ceiling of 200 short-form and 30 long-form videos for $2,000. The difference is not the word unlimited, it is the throughput underneath it.
Vidchops publish $495 and $995 a month in credits, where one credit is one long-form video or four short-form videos. We publish $2,000 for up to 200 short-form and 30 long-form. Here is how those actually compare.
Video Husky publish the clearest spec sheet in this category, from $849 to $2,749 a month with weekly editor hours stated. We publish $2,000 for up to 200 short-form and 30 long-form videos. The split is cleaner than usual.
Send me last month's publishing count and I will put both prices next to each other honestly, including the case where paying per video wins, because that happens more often than agencies like to admit. So yeah. That's my way of saying it.